Abstract
This study examines the extent to which the adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) at the enterprise level in Europe is shaped by government institutional readiness and national cultural dimensions. Integrating institutional theory with Hofstede's cultural dimensions model, the research analyzes how the Government AI Readiness Index, Uncertainty Avoidance (UAI), and Long-Term Orientation (LTO) influence AI adoption in 31 European countries in 2025. Using a multiple linear regression model with interaction terms, the study tests the direct and moderating effects of these factors on the proportion of businesses using AI technologies. The results confirm that government institutional readiness exerts a significant positive effect on AI adoption (B = . 450, p = . 006), explaining 52.4% of the variation in adoption (R2 = . 524, F = 7.147, p < . 001). Uncertainty avoidance moderates this relationship (B = -. 290, p = . 055), diminishing the positive effect of institutional readiness in societies with high UAI. The direct effects of UAI and LTO are not significant in the full model, suggesting that the influence of culture is predominantly conditional. The study demonstrates that the success of public policies promoting AI depends on the alignment between institutional capacity and the national cultural context. The practical implications highlight the need for culturally adapted national strategies, mechanisms to reduce perceived risk, and managerial practices that address the anxiety associated with technological change in contexts with high uncertainty avoidance.
Cuvinte cheie
artificial intelligence adoption
institutional readiness
cultural dimensions
strategic leadership
uncertainty avoidance
digital transformation
Istoric articol
Publicat
01.04.2026
Informații autori
Citare recomandată
Oana‑Roxana Radu (2026). Why Do Enterprises Adopt AI? Government AI Readiness and Cultural Leadership Contexts in Europe. Journal of Economic Sciences, 1(2), 406–420. https://doi.org/10.65631/jes.2.2026.33
Referințe bibliografice
[1] Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
[2] Pan, Y.-H. (2023). A study of the impact of cultural characteristics on consumers' behavioral intention for mobile payments: A comparison between China and Korea. Sustainability, 15(8), 6956. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086956
[3] Neumann, O., Guirguis, K., Steiner, R. (2024). Exploring artificial intelligence adoption in public organizations: a comparative case study. Public Management Review, 26(1), 114-141. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2022.2048685
[4] Schildt, H. (2022). The institutional logic of digitalization. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 83, 235-251. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X20220000083010
[5] Fdez. de Arroyabe, J.C., Arranz, C.F.A., Arroyabe, M.F., Fernandez De Arroyabe, I. (2024). Unravelling the dynamics of AI adoption in SMEs: A comprehensive analysis in the EU context. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4751811
[6] European Commission (2021). Coordinated Plan on Artificial Intelligence 2021 Review. Brussels. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/coordinated-plan-artificial-intelligence-2021-review
[7] Oxford Insights (2025). Government AI Readiness Index 2025. https://oxfordinsights.com/ai-readiness/government-ai-readiness-index-2025/
[8] Aivaz, K.A., Tofan, I. (2022). The synergy between digitalization and the level of research and business development allocations at EU level. Studies in Business and Economics, 17(3), 5-17. https://doi.org/10.2478/sbe-2022-0042
[9] Ionescu, A.M., Clipa, A.M., Turnea, E.-S., Clipa, C.I., Bedrule-Grigoruță, M.V. (2022). The impact of innovation framework conditions on corporate digital technology integration: institutions as facilitators for sustainable digital transformation. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 23(6), 1396-1419. https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2022.17039
[10] Eurostat (2025). Enterprises using artificial intelligence technologies. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/isoc_eb_ai/default/table?lang=en
[11] Hofstede Insights (2025). Country Comparison Tool. https://www.theculturefactor.com/country-comparison-tool
[12] Shane, S. (1993). Cultural influences on national rates of innovation. Journal of Business Venturing, 8(1), 59-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(93)90011-S
[13] Cornell University, INSEAD, WIPO (2023). The Global Innovation Index 2023: Innovation in the Face of Uncertainty. Geneva. https://doi.org/10.34667/tind.48220
[14] Kaasa, A., Vadi, M. (2008). How does culture contribute to innovation? Evidence from European countries. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1268359
[15] Sartono, A., Pramono, R., Purwanto, A., Juliana, J. (2024). Uncertainty avoidance as a moderator of digital trust and Industry 4.0 technology adoption intention. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 8(1), 425-436. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.26302273
[16] Rubino, M., Vitolla, F., Raimo, N., Garcia-Sanchez, I.M. (2020). Cross-country differences in European firms' digitalization: the role of national culture. Management Decision, 58(8), 1563-1583. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-08-2019-1120
[17] Machado, C.G., Winroth, M., Carlsson, D., Almström, P., Centerholt, V., Hallin, M. (2021). Digital organizational readiness: experiences from manufacturing companies. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 32(9), 167-182. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-05-2019-0188
[18] Hradecky, D., Kennell, J.S., Cai, W., Davidson, R. (2022). Organizational readiness to adopt artificial intelligence in the exhibition sector in Western Europe. International Journal of Information Management, 67, 102497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102497
[19] Leso, B.H., Cortimiglia, M.N., Ghezzi, A., Gastaldi, L. (2022). The contribution of organizational culture, structure, and leadership factors in the digital transformation of SMEs: a mixed-methods approach. Cognition, Technology & Work, 25, 345-368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-022-00714-2
[20] Van Dun, D.H., Kumar, M. (2023). Social enablers of Industry 4.0 technology adoption: transformational leadership and emotional intelligence. International Journal of Operation & Production Management, 44(2), 233-260. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijopm-06-2022-0370
[21] Faiz, M., Sarwar, N., Tariq, A., Memon, M.A. (2024). Mastering digital leadership capabilities for business model innovation: the role of managerial decision-making and grants. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 31(5), 901-924. https://doi.org/10.1108/jsbed-07-2023-0341
[22] Aivaz, K.A. (2021). The impact of ICT on education and living standards. Case study in Constanta County, Romania. In: Under the pressure of digitalization: challenges and solutions at organizational and industrial levels (First edition, pp. 8-16). Bologna, Italy: Filodiritto Publisher, Informatica srl. ISBN 979-12-80225-27-6.
[23] Bogoslov, I.A., Corman, S., Lungu, A.E. (2024). Perspectives on artificial intelligence adoption for European Union elderly in the context of digital skills development. Sustainability, 16(11), 4579. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16114579
[24] Râlea, I.-A., Pintilescu, C., Șerban, I.-O., Aivaz, K.-A. (2026). Data-driven efficiency analysis of EU higher education systems using stochastic frontier models. Systems, 14(1), 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems14010049
[25] Micu, A., Capatina, A., Micu, A.E., Geru, M., Aivaz, K.A., Muntean, M.C. (2021). A new challenge in digital economy: neuromarketing applied to social media. Economic Computation & Economic Cybernetics Studies & Research, 55(4). https://doi.org/10.24818/18423264/55.4.21.09
[26] Teodorescu, D., Aivaz, K.-A., Vancea, D.P.C., Condrea, E., Dragan, C., Olteanu, A.C. (2023). Consumer trust in AI algorithms used in e-commerce: a case study of college students at a Romanian public university. Sustainability, 15(15), 11925. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151511925
[27] Aivaz, K.A., Teodorescu, D. (2023). Advantages and disadvantages of using devices during in-person courses. Case study at a public university in Romania. Studies in Business and Economics, 18(2), 24-36. https://doi.org/10.2478/sbe-2023-0022
[28] Jula, D., Mastac, L., Vancea, D.P.C., Aivaz, K.A. (2025). A deep dive into institutional and economic influences on poverty in Europe. Risks, 13(6), 104. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks13060104