Abstract
Gender disparities in hiring persist even when organizations formally endorse equal opportunity and merit-based selection. This article examines the gender gap in recruitment through the lens of organizational culture and argues that hiring outcomes are shaped not only by individual prejudice, but also by shared assumptions, routines, symbols, language, and informal definitions of the 'ideal' employee. Drawing on research on gender stereotypes, cultural matching, job-advertisement wording, evaluation bias, and systemic discrimination, the paper develops a conceptual framework linking organizational culture to four stages of hiring: attraction, screening, interviewing, and final selection. The analysis shows how apparently neutral practices may reproduce gendered expectations when cultural fit is interpreted narrowly, evaluation criteria remain ambiguous, or masculine-coded norms are treated as indicators of competence and leadership potential. The article also identifies practical mechanisms for reducing gender bias, including structured criteria, standardized interviews, transparent decision rules, inclusive recruitment communication, diverse evaluation panels, and continuous monitoring of hiring outcomes. The central conclusion is that narrowing the gender gap requires cultural and procedural change to operate together rather than relying exclusively on individual-level bias training.
Cuvinte cheie
organizational culture
gender gap
hiring
recruitment
gender bias
cultural fit
Istoric articol
Publicat
31.08.2026
Informații autori
Citare recomandată
Ioana Alexandra Ghintueală (Hatară), Carina-Elena Stegăroiu (2026). The Gender Gap in Hiring Viewed Through the Lens of a Company’s Organizational Culture. Constantin Brâncuși University of Târgu Jiu Economics Series, 2(1), 170–177. https://doi.org/10.65631/jes.4.2026.16
Referințe bibliografice
Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society, 4(2), 139-158. Agan, A., Cowgill, B., & Gee, L. K. (2025). Salary history and employer demand: Evidence from a two-sided audit. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 17(3), 380-413. Bohren, J. A., Hull, P., & Imas, A. (2022; revised 2024). Systemic discrimination: Theory and measurement. NBER Working Paper No. 29820. Correll, S. J. (2017). Reducing gender biases in modern workplaces: A small wins approach to organizational change. Gender & Society, 31(6), 725-750. Delfino, A. (2024). Breaking gender barriers: Experimental evidence on men in pink-collar jobs. American Economic Review, 114(6), 1816-1853. Eames, T. (2025). How does the intersection of sex and nonbinary gender identity affect hiring discrimination? Evidence from a correspondence field experiment. AEA Papers and Proceedings, 115, 202-208. Gaucher, D., Friesen, J., & Kay, A. C. (2011). Evidence that gendered wording in job advertisements exists and sustains gender inequality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(1), 109-128. Heilman, M. E. (2012). Gender stereotypes and workplace bias. Research in Organizational Behavior, 32, 113-135. Ji, S., & Chen, Z. (2024). How job crafters are selected during recruitment: An invisible filter based on job crafting experiences and applicant gender. Journal of Business Research, 170, 114348. McKinsey & Company & LeanIn.Org. (2024). Women in the Workplace 2024. Moss-Racusin, C. A., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Graham, M. J., & Handelsman, J. (2012). Science faculty's subtle gender biases favor male students. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(41), 16474-16479. Neumark, D., Burn, I., & Button, P. (2016). Experimental age discrimination evidence and the Heckman critique. American Economic Review, 106(5), 303-308. Rivera, L. A. (2012). Hiring as cultural matching: The case of elite professional service firms. American Sociological Review, 77(6), 999-1022. Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational Culture and Leadership (4th ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Stamarski, C. S., & Son Hing, L. S. (2015). Gender inequalities in the workplace: The effects of organizational structures, processes, practices, and decision makers' sexism. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1400.