Abstract
One of the central instruments for stimulating regional economic development in the European Union is represented by investment subsidies. Theoretically, these should be very efficient, practically representing a capital injection, but the scientific literature in this field is divided. On the one hand, some of the authors who have studied this subject conclude that European funds have positive effects, supporting the economic growth of the beneficiary regions, on the other hand some authors claim that these subsidies are effective only under certain conditions, that is, they have a conditional positive effect, however there are also authors who claim that subsidies granted to private enterprises do not have notable effects on efficiency and therefore do not lead to economic growth, resulting in a waste of funds.
This article represents an exploratory research of this phenomenon in Romania, the scientific literature on this subject being focused more on macroeconomic, econometric analyses than on microeconomic analyses at the firm level. In this study, we focused on a call for projects within the National Rural Development Program 2014-2020, a program financed by the European Union, and we analysed the evolution of the economic and financial situations of the firms that won and implemented projects with non-reimbursable financing, comparing the evolution of some key indicators with that of a control group.
The results obtained clearly indicate that these non-reimbursable financial aids contribute to increasing the productivity and efficiency of beneficiary companies, demonstrating that at the Romanian level, European funds are efficient, generating structural changes that lead to sustainable economic growth.
This article represents an exploratory research of this phenomenon in Romania, the scientific literature on this subject being focused more on macroeconomic, econometric analyses than on microeconomic analyses at the firm level. In this study, we focused on a call for projects within the National Rural Development Program 2014-2020, a program financed by the European Union, and we analysed the evolution of the economic and financial situations of the firms that won and implemented projects with non-reimbursable financing, comparing the evolution of some key indicators with that of a control group.
The results obtained clearly indicate that these non-reimbursable financial aids contribute to increasing the productivity and efficiency of beneficiary companies, demonstrating that at the Romanian level, European funds are efficient, generating structural changes that lead to sustainable economic growth.
Cuvinte cheie
European grants
economic development
economic productivity
Istoric articol
Publicat
01.04.2026
Informații autori
Citare recomandată
Andrei-Alexandru Moroșan (2026). Do EU Grants Have an Impact on Private Productivity and Efficiency? An Empirical Analysis on Romanian Companies. Journal of Economic Sciences, 1(2), 150–160. https://doi.org/10.65631/jes.2.2026.15
Referințe bibliografice
[1] Alexa, M. M. (2026). Changes in Leader Funding for Non-Agricultural Areas. Annals of the „Constantin Brâncuşi” University of Târgu Jiu, Economy Series, 313-325.
[2] Barry, F., Bradley, J., & Hannan, A. (2001). The Single Market, The Structural Funds and Ireland's Recent Economic Growth. Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 39, nr. 3, 537 - 552.
[3] Becker, S., Egger, P., & Ehrlich, v. M. (2018). Effects of EU Regional Policy: 1989-2013. Regional Science and Urban Economics 69 (2018), 143–152.
[4] Dinu, M., Lădaru, G.-R., Petre, I.-L., & Mocanu, S. (2026). Territorial Disparities and the Dynamics of Agricultural Investment Implementation in Romania: Analysis of Measures DR-15 and DR-20 in the 2023–2027 National Strategic Plan. Annals of the „Constantin Brâncuşi” University of Târgu Jiu, Economy Series, 83-92.
[5] Dumčiuvienė, D., & Adomynienė, I. (2014). The Evaluation of European Union Structural Support. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 156, 382 – 387.
[6] Dvouletý, O., Srhoj, S., & Pantea, S. (2020). Public SME grants and firm performance in European Union: A systematic review of empirical evidence. Small Business Economics, Volume 57, 243–263.
[7] Ederveen, S., Groot, L. H., & Nahuis, R. (2002). Fertile Soil for Structural Funds? Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper TI 2002-096/3.
[8] Jureviciene, D., & Pileckaitė, J. (2013). The Impact of EU Structural Fund Support and Problems of its Absorption. Business, Management and Education. 11. , 1-18.
[9] Kállay, L., & Takács, T. (2023). The impact of public subsidies on investment and growth: Policy about evaluation, selection and monitoring. Journal of Policy Modeling Volume 45, Issue 5, 895-909.
[10] Mavrommati, A., Chatzitheodoridis, F., Pliakoura, A., & Kalogiannidis, S. (2025). Assessing Operational and Investment Efficiency in the Greek Dairy Industry: A DEA-Based Composite Model. Scientific Annals of Economics and Business Vol. 72 No. 3 (2025), 465-488.
[11] Millot, V., Rawdanowicz, L., Sauvage, J., & Lieshout, E. v. (2025, July). The market implications of industrial subsidies. VoxEU. CEPR.
[12] Pintilescu, C. (2022). Analiza statistica a datelor in SPSS si in R. Iasi: Editura Sedcom Libris.
[13] Reiner, M. (2003). The Impact of the EU’s Structural and Cohesion Funds on Real Convergence in the EU. NBP Conference Potential Output and Barriers to Growth ZALESIE GÓRNE.
[14] Šelebaj, D., & Bule, M. (2021). Effects of grants from EU funds on business performance of non-financial corporations in Croatia. Public Sector Economics, Vol. 45 No. 2, 177-207.
[15] Tabără, N., Horomnea, E., & Toma, C. (2005). Analiza contabil-financiară. Iaşi: Editura Tipo Moldova.
[16] Varga, J., & Veld, J. i. (2009). A Model-based Assessment of the Macroeconomic Impact of EU Structural Funds on the New Member States. European Economy. Economic Papers 371. March 2009. Brussels.
[17] Wostner, P. (2008). Micro-efficiency of the EU Cohesion Policy. European Policies Research Center, Glasgow.
[18] Žampa, S., & Bojnec, Š. (2017). The Impact of Subsidies on Production Innovation and Sustainable Growth. Management and Production Engineering Review, 54-63.
[19] *** Rural Investment Financing Agency – www.afir.ro (consulted December 2025)
[20] *** Ministry of Public Finance – www.mfinanate.gov.ro (consulted January 2026)