Articole

Geopolitical Risk, Digital Trust and Exchange Rate Management under Inflation Targeting: Evidence from Romania

VE
Violeta Iuliana Enache ✉
The Bucharest University of Economic…
RM
Robert Maftei
The Bucharest University of Economic…
2026 / Nr. 4 pp. 8–22 Engleză DOI: 10.65631/jes.4.2026.1
Constantin Brâncuși University of Târgu Jiu Economics Series · 2026
The intensification of geopolitical tensions over the past decade has fundamentally altered the macro financial environment facing central banks in emerging economies, challenging the adequacy of conventional inflation targeting frameworks and their underlying analytical infrastructures. This paper investigates the dynamic relationship between geopolitical risk, exchange rate volatility, and central bank credibility in Romania, a small open economy operating under formal inflation targeting since 2005, over the period February 2015 to December 2025. Using monthly data on exchange rate returns, sovereign spreads, central bank reserves, policy rates, and the Geopolitical Risk Index of Caldara and Iacoviello (2022), we estimate a GARCH (1,1) model with exogenous regressors to assess volatility dynamics, complemented by a VAR (2) framework with impulse response functions and forecast error variance decomposition. The results reveal three findings of analytical significance. First, the conditional volatility of the EUR/RON exchange rate follows an Integrated GARCH process (α + β = 1.000), indicating that geopolitical shocks permanently alter the exchange rate variance regime rather than generating transient perturbations. Second, the impulse response analysis documents a three-month lag in the NBR monetary policy rate response to geopolitical shocks, confirming the reactive character of the inflation targeting framework under conditions of structurally elevated uncertainty. Third, geopolitical risk shocks explain 12.5 percent of the forecast error variance of the policy rate and 24.0 percent of reserve variation at the twelve-month horizon, revealing that the NBR's intervention and rate-setting decisions are substantially conditioned by the geopolitical environment. Building on these results, the paper introduces the concept of digital trust in monetary policy understood as the capacity of central banks to strengthen institutional credibility through the transparency, verifiability, and real-time responsiveness of their analytical processes. By linking the empirically documented analytical lag to the broader TrustTech paradigm, the study argues that the integration of artificial intelligence, machine learning, and high-frequency digital tools into central bank operations is not a discretionary upgrade but an institutional necessity in an era of persistent geopolitical uncertainty. The findings carry direct policy relevance for emerging market central banks at early stages of digital transformation and contribute to the nascent literature connecting TrustTech infrastructures to macroeconomic governance.
geopolitical risk exchange rate volatility digital trust TrustTech monetary policy credibility GARCH VAR Romania inflation targeting central bank communication
Publicat
31.08.2026
VE
Violeta Iuliana Enache Corespondent
The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Department of Money and Banking, Bucharest, Romania
RM
Robert Maftei
The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Department of Money and Banking, Bucharest, Romania
Violeta Iuliana Enache, Robert Maftei (2026). Geopolitical Risk, Digital Trust and Exchange Rate Management under Inflation Targeting: Evidence from Romania. Constantin Brâncuși University of Târgu Jiu Economics Series, 2(1), 8–22. https://doi.org/10.65631/jes.4.2026.1
Aliu, F., Kučera, J., & Horák, J. (2024). Exchange rate instabilities during the Russia–Ukraine war: Evidence from V4 countries. Heliyon, 10(3), Article e25476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25476 Araujo, D. K. G., Doerr, S., Gambacorta, L., & Tissot, B. (2024). Artificial intelligence in central banking. BIS Bulletin, No. 84. Bank for International Settlements. https://www.bis.org/publ/bisbull84.htm Baker, S. R., Bloom, N., & Davis, S. J. (2016). Measuring economic policy uncertainty. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(4), 1593–1636. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjw024 Bernanke, B. S., Laubach, T., Mishkin, F. S., & Posen, A. S. (1999). Inflation targeting: Lessons from the international experience. Princeton University Press. BIS. (2024). Annual Economic Report 2024: Chapter III — The digital economy. Bank for International Settlements. https://www.bis.org/publ/arpdf/ar2024e3.htm Bollerslev, T. (1986). Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics, 31(3), 307–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(86)90063-1 Bordo, M. D., & Siklos, P. L. (2021). The decline and rise of central bank credibility (NBER Working Paper No. 26342). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w26342 Caldara, D., & Iacoviello, M. (2022). Measuring geopolitical risk. American Economic Review, 112(4), 1194–1225. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20191823 Caldara, D., Conlisk, S., Iacoviello, M., & Penn, M. (2025). Do geopolitical risks raise or lower inflation? Journal of International Economics, 159, Article 104188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2025.104188 Carrière-Swallow, Y., Gruss, B., Magud, N. E., & Valencia, F. (2021). Monetary policy credibility and exchange rate pass-through. International Journal of Central Banking, 17(3), 61–94. CNB. (2025, February). Using large language models for inflation forecasting: First experiments at the CNB [CNB Research and Policy Notes]. Czech National Bank. https://www.cnb.cz/en/research/research-publications/cnb-blog/ Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366a), 427–431. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1979.10482531 ECB. (2022). One year since Russia's invasion of Ukraine: The effects on euro area inflation (ECB Economic Bulletin, Issue 2/2022). European Central Bank. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/economic-bulletin/html/eb202202.en.html ECB. (2025, November). Real-time geopolitical risk indicators for the euro area and member states [ECB Blog]. European Central Bank. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/blog/ Erste Group Research. (2023). CEE Special Report: Exchange rate development in the region. Erste Group Bank AG. https://www.erstegroup.com/en/research/report/en/SR376057 European Commission. (2022). Proposal for a regulation on a European Digital Identity Framework (eIDAS 2.0) (COM/2021/281 final). European Commission. https://digitalstrategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/eidas-regulation Faria-e-Castro, M., & Leibovici, F. (2024). Inflation and the price of real assets. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 106(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.20955/r.106.1-22 Georgieva, K. (2023). Digital trust and economic governance in an era of uncertainty. Economic Studies, 69(3), 3–18. Bulgarian Academy of Sciences. Gopinath, G. (2015). The international price system (NBER Working Paper No. 21646). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w21646 Ha, J., Kose, M. A., & Ohnsorge, F. (2021). Inflation during the pandemic: What happened? What is next? (World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 9616). World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-9616 IMF. (2023). World Economic Outlook: A rocky recovery. International Monetary Fund. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/Issues/2023/04/11/world-economic-outlook-april-2023 IMF. (2025). Global Financial Stability Report: Chapter 2 — Geopolitical fragmentation and financial stability. International Monetary Fund. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/GFSR Kiley, M. T., & Mishkin, F. S. (2025, January). Inflation targeting: Its current state and key challenges [VoxEU Column]. CEPR/VoxEU. https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/inflationtargeting-its-current-state-and-key-challenges Liu, T., Mumtaz, H., & Theophilopoulou, A. (2024). Machine learning for inflation forecasting in emerging market economies (IMF Working Paper No. 24/206). International Monetary Fund. https://doi.org/10.5089/9798400285066.001 Maftei, R., & Enache, V. I. (2026). Geopolitical risk, exchange rate volatility, and inflation targeting in emerging Europe: Evidence from CEE economies and implications for AI-assisted monetary policy. In ICBE 2026 Conference Proceedings: Finance and Banking in a Technologically Integrated World. The Bucharest University of Economic Studies Press. Pîrvu, D., Badea, L., & Meghisan-Toma, G. (2023). Macroeconomic risks and monetary policy in Central European countries: Parallels in the Czech Republic, Hungary, and Poland. Risks, 11(11), 200. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks11110200 Simionescu, M. (2025). Machine learning vs. econometric models to forecast inflation rate in Romania? The role of sentiment analysis. Mathematics, 13(1), 168. https://doi.org/10.3390/math13010168 Svensson, L. E. O. (2010). Inflation targeting. In B. M. Friedman & M. Woodford (Eds.), Handbook of Monetary Economics (Vol. 3, pp. 1237–1302). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53454-5.00010-4 Taylor, J. B. (2001). The role of the exchange rate in monetary-policy rules. American Economic Review, 91(2), 263–267. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.2.263 World Bank. (2024). Geopolitical risk and macroeconomic outcomes: New evidence and transmission channels (World Bank Policy Research Working Paper). World Bank Group. https://www.worldbank.org/en/research/
Scroll to Top