Abstract
t
This article analyses ethical standards in the exercise of financial control, starting from the premise that the
effectiveness of control does not depend exclusively on the robustness of procedures, the quality of audit or the
performance of monitoring technologies, but also on the ability of organisations to transform integrity into a real
criterion of decision making. In contrast to approaches that associate ethics almost exclusively with fraud prevention
or with the ex-post sanctioning of misconduct, the present study treats financial control as an institutional practice of
evaluating, challenging and validating economic truth. From this perspective, ethical standards are not formulated as
simple declarative values, but as operational requirements concerning impartiality, traceability of decisions,
independence of judgement, reporting of irregularities and protection of the public interest. The analysis is based on
the main international normative frameworks and on recent academic literature. The instruments developed by IESBA,
COSO, ACFE and OECD are examined comparatively, both in terms of their contribution to shaping ethical financial
control and in relation to their practical limitations. At the same time, the article explores the role of organisational
culture, leadership, incentives and whistleblowing, showing that ethical standards become effective only when they are
supported by a coherent architecture of governance and ethical performance assessment. Special attention is given to
the relationship between internal control, audit and technology, including the challenges introduced by artificial
intelligence into verification and oversight processes. The case study dedicated to the Wells Fargo scandal illustrates
how ethical standards may be emptied of substance when performance indicators, the logic of reward and hierarchical
deference capture control functions. The central conclusion is that the ethical exercise of financial control requires
more than written rules. It requires institutions capable of correctly measuring risk signals, protecting legitimate
dissent and refusing to convert financial truth into a mere managerial instrument.
This article analyses ethical standards in the exercise of financial control, starting from the premise that the
effectiveness of control does not depend exclusively on the robustness of procedures, the quality of audit or the
performance of monitoring technologies, but also on the ability of organisations to transform integrity into a real
criterion of decision making. In contrast to approaches that associate ethics almost exclusively with fraud prevention
or with the ex-post sanctioning of misconduct, the present study treats financial control as an institutional practice of
evaluating, challenging and validating economic truth. From this perspective, ethical standards are not formulated as
simple declarative values, but as operational requirements concerning impartiality, traceability of decisions,
independence of judgement, reporting of irregularities and protection of the public interest. The analysis is based on
the main international normative frameworks and on recent academic literature. The instruments developed by IESBA,
COSO, ACFE and OECD are examined comparatively, both in terms of their contribution to shaping ethical financial
control and in relation to their practical limitations. At the same time, the article explores the role of organisational
culture, leadership, incentives and whistleblowing, showing that ethical standards become effective only when they are
supported by a coherent architecture of governance and ethical performance assessment. Special attention is given to
the relationship between internal control, audit and technology, including the challenges introduced by artificial
intelligence into verification and oversight processes. The case study dedicated to the Wells Fargo scandal illustrates
how ethical standards may be emptied of substance when performance indicators, the logic of reward and hierarchical
deference capture control functions. The central conclusion is that the ethical exercise of financial control requires
more than written rules. It requires institutions capable of correctly measuring risk signals, protecting legitimate
dissent and refusing to convert financial truth into a mere managerial instrument.
Cuvinte cheie
ethical standards
financial control
internal control
corporate governance
whistleblowing.
Istoric articol
Publicat
26.06.2026
Informații autori
Citare recomandată
PAUL - BOGDAN ZAMFIR, LOREDANA CIURLĂU (2026). ETHICAL STANDARDS IN THE EXERCISE OF FINANCIAL CONTROL. Constantin Brâncuși University of Târgu Jiu Economics Series, 1(3), 280–288. https://doi.org/10.65631/jes.3.2026.25
Referințe bibliografice
[1]. ACFE. 2024. Occupational Fraud 2024: A Report to the Nations. Austin, TX:
Association of Certified Fraud Examiners.
[2]. ACFE. 2026. Occupational Fraud 2026: A Report to the Nations. Austin, TX:
Association of Certified Fraud Examiners.
[3]. Amore Mario Daniele, Orsola Garofalo, Alice Guerra. 2023. “How Leaders Influence (un)Ethical Behaviors Within Organizations: A Laboratory Experiment on Reporting Choices.” Journal of Business Ethics 183: 495–510.
[4]. CFPB. 2016. “Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Fines Wells Fargo $100 Million for Widespread Illegal Practice of Secretly Opening Unauthorized Accounts.” Washington, D.C.: Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
[5]. CFPB. 2022. “CFPB Orders Wells Fargo to Pay $3.7 Billion for Widespread
Mismanagement of Auto Loans, Mortgages, and Deposit Accounts.” Washington, D.C.: Consumer
Financial
[6]. COSO, ACFE. 2023. Fraud Risk Management Guide. 2nd ed. New York and Austin:
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and Association of Certified
Fraud Examiners.
[7]. COSO. 2024. Achieving Effective Internal Control Over Robotic Process Automation.
New York: Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
[10]. COSO. 2026. Corporate Governance: Guiding Principles for Board Oversight. New
York: Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
[8]. COSO. 2026. Achieving Effective Internal Control Over Generative AI. New York:
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
[9]. Fedyk, Anastassia, James Hodson, Natalya Khimich, and Tatiana Fedyk. 2022. “Is
Artificial Intelligence Improving the Audit Process?” Review of Accounting Studies 27: 938–985.
[10]. IESBA. 2024. Handbook of the International Code of Ethics for Professional
Accountants, Including International Independence Standards. New York: International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants.
[11]. IESBA. 2026. Proportionality of the IESBA Code. New York: International Ethics
Standards Board for Accountants.
[12]. IESBA. 2026. IESBA Snapshot: Post Implementation Reviews of NOCLAR Standard
and Restructured Code. New York: International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants.
[13]. Kaptein, Muel. 2023. “A Paradox of Ethics: Why People in Good Organizations Do Bad Things.” Journal of Business Ethics 184: 297–316.
[14] Keßels, Isabelle. 2022. “Bonus Systems as Tools for ‘Managing’ Managers: The
Behavioural Effects of Performance Based Financial Rewards.” Philosophy of Management 21: 113.
[15]. Kim, Taek Kyu. 2025. “Impact of Low Performance Signals on Employee Fraud in
Public Organizations: Evidence from a Pay for Performance Context.” Public Administration Review 85(3): 681–697.
[16]. Meyer, Marco, and Chun Wei Choo. 2024. “Harming by Deceit: Epistemic.
Malevolence and Organizational Wrongdoing.” Journal of Business Ethics 189: 439–452.
[17]. OECD. 2020. OECD Public Integrity Handbook. Paris: OECD Publishing.
[18]. OECD. 2026. “Public Integrity Indicators.” Paris: Organisation for Economic Co
operation and Development.
[19]. OCC. 2016. “OCC Assesses Penalty Against Wells Fargo, Orders Restitution for
Unsafe or Unsound Sales Practices.” Washington, D.C.: Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.
[20]. Piest, Simon, and Philipp Schreck. 2021. “Contests and Unethical Behavior in
Organizations: A Review and Synthesis of the Empirical Literature.” Management Review Quarterly 71: 679–721.
[21]. SEC Office of the Whistleblower. 2026. Annual Report to Congress for Fiscal Year
2025. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
[22]. Sumanth, John J., Sean T. Hannah, Kenneth C. Herbst, și Ronald L. Thompson. 2024.
“Generating the Moral Agency to Report Peers’ Counterproductive Work Behavior in Normal and Extreme Contexts: The Generative Roles of Ethical Leadership, Moral Potency, and Psychological Safety.” Journal of Business Ethics 195: 653–680.
[23]. Vandekerckhove, Wim, Marianna Fotaki, Kate Kenny, and D. Derya Özdemir Kaya. 2026. “Signalling Trustworthiness of Internal Whistleblowing Channels in Organizations: Temporality Matters!” Organization Studies 47(3): 391–418.
[24]. Wells Fargo and Company, Independent Directors of the Board. 2017. Sales Practices Investigation Report. San Francisco: Wells Fargo and Company.