Abstract
This paper analyzes the evolution of population connectivity to drinking water infrastructure in Romania for the period 2014-2023, as well as forecasts for the future period 2024-2027, evaluating the impact of European funds on the process of regional development and convergence. The methodology is a quantitative one, based on the processing of data provided by INS Tempo for the four macroregions of the country through the IBM SPSS Statistics software. The descriptive analysis and visualization through multiple line diagrams reveal a general trend of increasing the degree of connectivity in all the analyzed territorial units. However, the obtained results highlight deep and persistent regional disparities, statistically supported by a high standard deviation of 558,265.26 units compared to the general average of 3,387,834.38. While Macroregion 3 remains consistently the leader in connectivity, Macroregion 4 records the lowest values, although it follows an upward trend. Correlating infrastructure data with the GDP/capita indicator suggests that regional economic development is closely linked to investments in public utilities. The study concludes that although European funds have accelerated the development of water infrastructure, the pace of convergence is uneven, of which better targeted public policies are needed to reduce structural gaps between macroregions.
Cuvinte cheie
drinking water connectivity
regional development
European funds
macro-regional disparities
SPSS
Istoric articol
Publicat
01.04.2026
Informații autori
Citare recomandată
Vasilica‑Ramona Guță (Coconețu) (2026). Population Connectivity to Water Infrastructure: the Impact of European Funds on Regional Development. Journal of Economic Sciences, 1(2), 441–457. https://doi.org/10.65631/jes.2.2026.35
Referințe bibliografice
1. Anghelache, C. (2017). România 2017. Starea economică la un deceniu de la aderare. Editura Economică.
2. Anghelache, C., Soare, D. V., & Dumitrescu, D. (2016). IT&C Platform Used in Projects Financed from European Union Funds. Romanian Statistical Review, Supplement, (6), 59-67.
3. Anghelache, C., Anghel, M. G., Diaconu, A., Badiu, A., & Niţă, G. (2016). Modele utilizate în analiza absorbţiei fondurilor comunitare. În International Symposium „Romania in the European Union – Methods and Models of Macroeconomic Analysis and Prognosis” (pp. 278-292). Editura Artifex.
4. Aschauer, D. A. (1989). Is public expenditure productive? Journal of Monetary Economics, 23(2), 177-200.
5. Berezin, M., & Diez-Medrano, J. (2008). Distance matters: Place, political legitimacy and popular support for European integration. Comparative European Politics, 6(2), 1-32.
6. Farole, T., Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Storper, M. (2011). Cohesion Policy in the European Union: Growth, Geography, Institutions. Journal of Common Market Studies, 49(5), 1089-1111.
7. Iancu, A. (2012). Real Convergence in the European Union. Editura Academiei Române.
8. Institutul Național de Statistică (2024). Baza de date TEMPO-Online. Indicatori: CON103I, GOS101A. http://statistici.insse.ro:8077/tempo-online/